Combating late payment in commercial transactions ***I
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Combating late payment in commercial transactions ***I”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, PfE, NI, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (436 for, 109 against, 67 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany81
- France67
- Italy56
- Spain31
- Czech Republic20
- Netherlands14
- Hungary12
- Greece5
- Denmark
- Greece
- Netherlands
- Poland
- Romania
- Slovakia
- Spain
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…