Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Novel foods – the definition of ‘engineered nanomaterials’
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Novel foods – the definition of ‘engineered nanomaterials’”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, ECR, NI and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP voted mostly against. PfE and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (388 for, 188 against, 47 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France62
- Germany42
- Spain41
- Poland32
- Italy25
- Czech Republic11
- Hungary9
- Bulgaria8
- Bulgaria
- Czech Republic
- Germany
- Hungary
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Netherlands
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…