EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2024-09-19

The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "belarus"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "political prisoner"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 169543Source: official EP roll-call records
45
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • High-interest topic: Human Rights
  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+10 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+3 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus”. EPP, ECR, PfE and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (255 for, 316 against, 23 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
255
Against
316
Abstain
23
Margin of victory
61 votes
Turnout (cast)
594
Absent
127
Participation rate
82.4%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP188 MEPs
For 106Against 26Abstain 10Absent 46
S&D135 MEPs
For 2Against 103Abstain 6Absent 24
ECR82 MEPs
For 67Against 5Abstain 1Absent 9
Renew79 MEPs
For 0Against 69Abstain 2Absent 8
PfE77 MEPs
For 53Against 5Abstain 2Absent 17
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 0Against 50Abstain 0Absent 3
The Left45 MEPs
For 0Against 41Abstain 0Absent 4
NI30 MEPs
For 6Against 17Abstain 2Absent 5
ESN26 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Poland40
  • Italy35
  • Spain27
  • Romania16
  • Czech Republic11
Most against
  • Germany56
  • France40
  • Netherlands18
  • Portugal17
  • Sweden13
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Bulgaria
  • Croatia
  • France
  • Italy
  • Lithuania
  • Malta
  • Netherlands
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 8Against 8Abstain 0Absent 4
Belgium22 MEPs
For 5Against 12Abstain 1Absent 4
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 5Against 4Abstain 0Absent 8
Croatia12 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 0Absent 4
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 2Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
Czech Republic20 MEPs
For 11Against 4Abstain 0Absent 5
Denmark15 MEPs
For 2Against 6Abstain 5Absent 2
Estonia7 MEPs
For 2Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland16 MEPs
For 4Against 10Abstain 0Absent 2
France82 MEPs
For 33Against 40Abstain 1Absent 8
Germany96 MEPs
For 15Against 56Abstain 4Absent 21
Greece21 MEPs
For 0Against 6Abstain 5Absent 10
Hungary20 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 0Absent 13
Ireland14 MEPs
For 2Against 8Abstain 1Absent 3
Italy76 MEPs
For 35Against 30Abstain 1Absent 10
Latvia9 MEPs
For 4Against 2Abstain 1Absent 2
Lithuania12 MEPs
For 4Against 5Abstain 0Absent 3
Luxembourg7 MEPs
For 1Against 4Abstain 0Absent 2
Malta6 MEPs
For 2Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 12Against 18Abstain 0Absent 1
Poland53 MEPs
For 40Against 9Abstain 2Absent 2
Portugal21 MEPs
For 1Against 17Abstain 2Absent 1
Romania33 MEPs
For 16Against 11Abstain 0Absent 6
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 1Against 11Abstain 0Absent 3
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 5Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 27Against 27Abstain 0Absent 6
Sweden21 MEPs
For 8Against 13Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share