Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration
Russia95%★
- title mentions "russian"
Moldova95%
- title mentions "moldova"
Foreign Affairs75%
- "moldova" is a non-EU country topic
- "russian" is a non-EU country topic
Rule of Law65%
- title/description contains "constitutional"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Russia
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration”. PfE and ECR voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly against. EPP mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (156 for, 307 against, 180 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland25
- Czech Republic15
- Romania8
- Latvia4
- Slovenia4
- Germany56
- France42
- Italy30
- Spain24
- Netherlands17
- Estonia
- France
- Italy
- Lithuania
- Netherlands
- Romania
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…