EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2024-10-10

The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas

China95%
Confidence: 95%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title mentions "china"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on China
Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • "china" is a non-EU country topic
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Vote ID 169857Source: official EP roll-call records
75
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • High-interest topic: China
  • Strong political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+12 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+12 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas”. EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, PfE, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while NI voted mostly against. ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (540 for, 23 against, 47 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
540
Against
23
Abstain
47
Margin of victory
517 votes
Turnout (cast)
610
Absent
113
Participation rate
84.4%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP188 MEPs
For 153Against 0Abstain 1Absent 34
S&D135 MEPs
For 110Against 1Abstain 0Absent 24
ECR82 MEPs
For 71Against 0Abstain 4Absent 7
Renew79 MEPs
For 74Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
PfE81 MEPs
For 49Against 0Abstain 9Absent 23
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 50Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
The Left45 MEPs
For 24Against 1Abstain 10Absent 10
NI30 MEPs
For 6Against 18Abstain 2Absent 4
ESN26 MEPs
For 2Against 3Abstain 18Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • France73
  • Germany66
  • Italy56
  • Spain49
  • Poland45
Most against

None.

Divided delegations
  • Greece
  • Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Belgium22 MEPs
For 16Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 7Against 1Abstain 3Absent 6
Croatia12 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 3Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 15Against 2Abstain 2Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland16 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
France82 MEPs
For 73Against 0Abstain 3Absent 6
Germany96 MEPs
For 66Against 8Abstain 13Absent 9
Greece21 MEPs
For 4Against 3Abstain 1Absent 13
Hungary21 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 11
Ireland14 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy76 MEPs
For 56Against 0Abstain 8Absent 12
Latvia9 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Lithuania12 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Luxembourg7 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Malta6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 25Against 0Abstain 6Absent 0
Poland53 MEPs
For 45Against 1Abstain 5Absent 2
Portugal21 MEPs
For 18Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2
Romania33 MEPs
For 17Against 0Abstain 2Absent 14
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 7Against 7Abstain 0Absent 1
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain60 MEPs
For 49Against 0Abstain 2Absent 9
Sweden21 MEPs
For 21Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share