Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew and PPE groups
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew and PPE groups”. EPP, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while S&D, PfE, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (309 for, 191 against, 34 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany48
- France35
- Poland31
- Spain25
- Netherlands14
- Italy25
- Hungary13
- Austria9
- Slovakia8
- Cyprus2
- Austria
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- France
- Greece
- Hungary
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…