Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinations
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinations”. PfE, ECR, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP and Renew voted mostly against. S&D and Greens-EFA mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (281 for, 233 against, 128 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland44
- Italy40
- France39
- Czech Republic12
- Ireland12
- Germany55
- Spain36
- Netherlands20
- Sweden11
- Portugal10
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Cyprus
- Finland
- Greece
- Lithuania
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…