EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2025-01-22

Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "belarus"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Democracy64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "elections"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Democracy
Vote ID 171462Source: official EP roll-call records
82
/ 100

Importance Score

Key vote

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • High-interest topic: Democracy
  • Strong political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+10 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+12 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus”. EPP, S&D, Renew, PfE, ECR and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while NI voted mostly against. Left and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (567 for, 25 against, 66 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
567
Against
25
Abstain
66
Margin of victory
542 votes
Turnout (cast)
658
Absent
62
Participation rate
91.4%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 175Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10
S&D135 MEPs
For 124Against 1Abstain 1Absent 9
Renew79 MEPs
For 72Against 0Abstain 0Absent 7
PfE81 MEPs
For 50Against 0Abstain 21Absent 10
ECR82 MEPs
For 69Against 0Abstain 2Absent 11
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 51Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
The Left45 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 20Absent 7
NI30 MEPs
For 4Against 18Abstain 6Absent 2
ESN26 MEPs
For 3Against 6Abstain 14Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • France74
  • Germany66
  • Italy60
  • Spain53
  • Poland50
Most against

None.

Divided delegations
  • Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 6Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 19Against 0Abstain 2Absent 1
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 12Against 2Abstain 1Absent 2
Croatia12 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 15Against 3Abstain 0Absent 3
Denmark15 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
France82 MEPs
For 74Against 0Abstain 1Absent 7
Germany96 MEPs
For 66Against 8Abstain 15Absent 7
Greece21 MEPs
For 8Against 4Abstain 5Absent 4
Hungary21 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 10Absent 3
Ireland14 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Italy76 MEPs
For 60Against 0Abstain 7Absent 9
Latvia9 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 24Against 0Abstain 6Absent 1
Poland53 MEPs
For 50Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2
Portugal21 MEPs
For 19Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Romania33 MEPs
For 26Against 1Abstain 1Absent 5
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 7Against 6Abstain 2Absent 0
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Spain60 MEPs
For 53Against 0Abstain 4Absent 3
Sweden21 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share