Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP910521
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP910521”. PfE, ECR, Greens-EFA, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP and Renew voted mostly against. S&D mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (290 for, 249 against, 110 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France63
- Poland42
- Italy41
- Austria12
- Greece12
- Spain42
- Germany35
- Sweden16
- Netherlands13
- Portugal12
- Belgium
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- Malta
- Netherlands
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…