White paper on the future of European defence
Defence & Security87%★
- title/description contains "defence"
- title/description contains "european defence"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Defence
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Very close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “White paper on the future of European defence”. S&D, PfE, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP and Renew voted mostly against. ECR, NI and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (267 for, 280 against, 119 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.
Result analysis
Close vote analysis
The margin was 13 votes. 54 MEPs did not vote.
Groups whose absences exceeded the margin
- EPPhad 16 absent MEPs (margin was 13)
Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.
By political group
Country angle
- France54
- Italy25
- Spain25
- Portugal15
- Belgium9
- Germany39
- Poland22
- Netherlands19
- Romania14
- Sweden11
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Cyprus
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- Germany
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…