Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III
Budget66%★
- title/description contains "budget"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Resolution / budget vote
- ✓Budget-related
- ✓High-interest topic: Budget
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III”. Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, PfE and ESN voted mostly against. ECR and NI mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (184 for, 412 against, 81 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France71
- Spain30
- Cyprus3
- Germany65
- Italy36
- Romania30
- Poland28
- Netherlands24
- Cyprus
- Greece
- Portugal
- Spain
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…