Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III
Budget66%★
- title/description contains "budget"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Resolution / budget vote
- ✓Budget-related
- ✓High-interest topic: Budget
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (497 for, 135 against, 50 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany67
- Spain50
- Poland47
- Italy40
- France39
- Hungary12
- France
- Hungary
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…