Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III
Budget66%★
- title/description contains "budget"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Resolution / budget vote
- ✓Budget-related
- ✓High-interest topic: Budget
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III”. ECR, PfE and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (198 for, 434 against, 43 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Czech Republic13
- Bulgaria10
- Hungary10
- Latvia5
- Germany69
- France40
- Italy38
- Spain28
- Poland26
- Hungary
- Italy
- Latvia
- Poland
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…