EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2025-04-03

Immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus - threats from the Investigative Committee

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "belarus"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "repression"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 174984Source: official EP roll-call records
36
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • High-interest topic: Human Rights
  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+10 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+4 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Immediate risk of further repression by Lukashenka’s regime in Belarus - threats from the Investigative Committee”. EPP, S&D, Renew, ECR, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE, ESN and NI voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (477 for, 113 against, 15 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
477
Against
113
Abstain
15
Margin of victory
364 votes
Turnout (cast)
605
Absent
114
Participation rate
84.1%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 153Against 2Abstain 0Absent 30
S&D135 MEPs
For 115Against 0Abstain 0Absent 20
Renew79 MEPs
For 67Against 1Abstain 0Absent 11
ECR82 MEPs
For 56Against 7Abstain 5Absent 14
PfE81 MEPs
For 0Against 55Abstain 5Absent 21
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 50Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
The Left45 MEPs
For 34Against 3Abstain 1Absent 7
ESN26 MEPs
For 1Against 23Abstain 1Absent 1
NI29 MEPs
For 1Against 19Abstain 2Absent 7

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany62
  • Italy55
  • Poland47
  • Spain47
  • France37
Most against
  • Greece5
Divided delegations
  • France
  • Greece
  • Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 13Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 12Against 3Abstain 4Absent 3
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 8Against 4Abstain 0Absent 5
Croatia12 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 2Against 1Abstain 0Absent 3
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 8Against 4Abstain 7Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 12Against 2Abstain 0Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland15 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
France82 MEPs
For 37Against 34Abstain 0Absent 11
Germany95 MEPs
For 62Against 21Abstain 0Absent 12
Greece21 MEPs
For 4Against 5Abstain 0Absent 12
Hungary21 MEPs
For 8Against 1Abstain 0Absent 12
Ireland14 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 55Against 6Abstain 0Absent 15
Latvia9 MEPs
For 8Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 24Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Poland53 MEPs
For 47Against 2Abstain 0Absent 4
Portugal21 MEPs
For 15Against 2Abstain 0Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 21Against 2Abstain 1Absent 9
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 7Against 6Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain60 MEPs
For 47Against 5Abstain 0Absent 8
Sweden21 MEPs
For 15Against 1Abstain 1Absent 4

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share