Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Ombudsman
Budget87%★
- title/description contains "budget"
- title/description contains "discharge"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Resolution / budget vote
- ✓Budget-related
- ✓High-interest topic: Budget
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Ombudsman”. PfE, ECR, Left, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly against. S&D mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (246 for, 267 against, 139 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.
Result analysis
Close vote analysis
The margin was 21 votes. 68 MEPs did not vote.
Groups whose absences exceeded the margin
- EPPhad 23 absent MEPs (margin was 21)
Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.
By political group
Country angle
- France47
- Italy39
- Czech Republic15
- Hungary11
- Greece9
- Germany41
- Spain26
- Poland23
- Netherlands17
- Romania14
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Cyprus
- Germany
- Greece
- Latvia
- Lithuania
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…