Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) ***I
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) ***I”. EPP, ECR and PfE voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly against. Left, NI and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (314 for, 249 against, 81 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France61
- Poland45
- Italy44
- Spain27
- Romania15
- Germany52
- Netherlands24
- Sweden18
- Denmark12
- Ireland11
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Czech Republic
- Greece
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Portugal
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…