Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D and Renew groups
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D and Renew groups”. EPP, S&D, Greens-EFA, Renew and NI voted mostly in favour, while ECR voted mostly against. PfE, Left and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (300 for, 66 against, 77 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany56
- Spain24
- Italy20
- Netherlands19
- Poland19
None.
- Austria
- Czech Republic
- Hungary
- Latvia
- Poland
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…