Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability ***I
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability ***I”. EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (419 for, 97 against, 54 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany56
- Italy47
- Poland44
- Spain38
- Netherlands19
None.
- Bulgaria
- Cyprus
- France
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…