Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability ***I
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability ***I”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (301 for, 255 against, 19 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France59
- Spain27
- Netherlands20
- Bulgaria12
- Belgium11
- Germany41
- Poland41
- Italy30
- Hungary16
- Czech Republic12
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Estonia
- Germany
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…