Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability ***I
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability ***I”. Greens-EFA, Left, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, ECR and Renew voted mostly against. S&D and PfE mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (165 for, 272 against, 144 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany39
- Netherlands14
- Belgium11
- Bulgaria8
- Sweden7
- Poland43
- Italy30
- Spain19
- Romania14
- Czech Republic12
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Netherlands
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…