Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add certain countries to the list of high-risk third countries, and to remove other countries from that list
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add certain countries to the list of high-risk third countries, and to remove other countries from that list”. S&D, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, ECR, PfE, Renew and NI voted mostly against. ESN mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (264 for, 369 against, 55 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Spain37
- Czech Republic13
- Belgium11
- Denmark9
- Finland7
- France50
- Germany43
- Italy39
- Romania29
- Poland26
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…