Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles ***I
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles ***I”. PfE, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (207 for, 431 against, 10 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France51
- Austria13
- Hungary13
- Belgium11
- Germany66
- Italy44
- Spain44
- Poland41
- Romania29
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Finland
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Netherlands
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…