Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interference
Russia95%★
- title mentions "russian"
Moldova95%
- title mentions "moldova"
Foreign Affairs75%
- "moldova" is a non-EU country topic
- "russian" is a non-EU country topic
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Russia
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interference”. EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while NI and ESN voted mostly against. PfE and Left mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (490 for, 65 against, 86 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany67
- Italy49
- Spain45
- Poland41
- Romania25
- Slovakia7
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…