Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis”. S&D, ECR, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, Renew and ESN voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (322 for, 260 against, 82 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Italy55
- Spain33
- Poland22
- Greece18
- Romania15
- Germany49
- Netherlands16
- Sweden16
- Austria13
- Bulgaria11
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Germany
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…