Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties ***I
Agriculture66%★
- title/description contains "rural"
Social Affairs64%
- title/description contains "pensions"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Agriculture
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties ***I”. Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, PfE, ECR, Renew, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (136 for, 493 against, 10 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Denmark7
- France58
- Germany54
- Italy53
- Poland46
- Spain43
- Austria
- Belgium
- Denmark
- Germany
- Netherlands
- Slovakia
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…