Second World Summit for Social Development
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Second World Summit for Social Development”. PfE, ECR, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (185 for, 410 against, 13 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Czech Republic12
- Hungary12
- Germany64
- Spain41
- Italy37
- France36
- Poland24
- France
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Poland
- Romania
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…