Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "belarus"
Corruption65%
- title/description contains "fraud"
Democracy64%
- title/description contains "elections"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Corruption
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections”. EPP, S&D, Renew, ECR and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while NI voted mostly against. PfE, Left and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (458 for, 18 against, 84 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany56
- Italy49
- Spain44
- France42
- Poland40
None.
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…