Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations
Enlargement65%★
- title/description contains "enlargement"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Enlargement
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations”. EPP, S&D, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while PfE, ECR, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (326 for, 272 against, 29 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany61
- Spain40
- Italy28
- Romania18
- Netherlands17
- Poland43
- France39
- Hungary17
- Czech Republic14
- Greece11
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- France
- Italy
- Malta
- Netherlands
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…