EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2025-10-23

Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan

Vote ID 180286Source: official EP roll-call records
29
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly against. NI mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (363 for, 173 against, 28 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
363
Against
173
Abstain
28
Margin of victory
190 votes
Turnout (cast)
564
Absent
155
Participation rate
78.4%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 119Against 12Abstain 12Absent 42
S&D135 MEPs
For 104Against 0Abstain 0Absent 31
PfE83 MEPs
For 0Against 65Abstain 1Absent 17
Renew78 MEPs
For 61Against 3Abstain 0Absent 14
ECR82 MEPs
For 0Against 62Abstain 1Absent 19
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 43Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10
The Left45 MEPs
For 33Against 0Abstain 0Absent 12
NI29 MEPs
For 3Against 10Abstain 12Absent 4
ESN27 MEPs
For 0Against 20Abstain 2Absent 5

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany55
  • Spain41
  • France32
  • Italy32
  • Netherlands17
Most against
  • Poland25
  • Czech Republic14
  • Austria11
  • Hungary1
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Bulgaria
  • France
  • Italy
  • Latvia
  • Poland
  • Slovakia
  • Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 8Against 11Abstain 0Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 15Against 4Abstain 0Absent 3
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 7Against 4Abstain 1Absent 5
Croatia12 MEPs
For 7Against 1Abstain 1Absent 3
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 1Against 0Abstain 1Absent 4
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 3Against 14Abstain 3Absent 1
Denmark15 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2
Estonia7 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
France81 MEPs
For 32Against 32Abstain 6Absent 11
Germany96 MEPs
For 55Against 16Abstain 9Absent 16
Greece21 MEPs
For 4Against 1Abstain 3Absent 13
Hungary21 MEPs
For 0Against 1Abstain 0Absent 20
Ireland14 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy76 MEPs
For 32Against 21Abstain 0Absent 23
Latvia9 MEPs
For 5Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 7Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 17Against 8Abstain 1Absent 5
Poland53 MEPs
For 20Against 25Abstain 0Absent 8
Portugal21 MEPs
For 16Against 2Abstain 0Absent 3
Romania33 MEPs
For 14Against 6Abstain 1Absent 12
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 7Against 5Abstain 2Absent 1
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 41Against 7Abstain 0Absent 12
Sweden21 MEPs
For 11Against 6Abstain 0Absent 4

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share