EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2025-10-23

Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan

Vote ID 180288Source: official EP roll-call records
31
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Strong political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+12 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan”. EPP, S&D, Renew, ECR, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE and ESN voted mostly against. NI mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (439 for, 100 against, 29 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
439
Against
100
Abstain
29
Margin of victory
339 votes
Turnout (cast)
568
Absent
151
Participation rate
79.0%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 139Against 5Abstain 0Absent 41
S&D135 MEPs
For 105Against 0Abstain 0Absent 30
PfE83 MEPs
For 1Against 58Abstain 7Absent 17
Renew78 MEPs
For 63Against 0Abstain 1Absent 14
ECR82 MEPs
For 52Against 6Abstain 6Absent 18
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 43Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10
The Left45 MEPs
For 32Against 0Abstain 1Absent 12
NI29 MEPs
For 4Against 7Abstain 14Absent 4
ESN27 MEPs
For 0Against 23Abstain 0Absent 4

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany61
  • Italy46
  • Spain44
  • Poland37
  • France36
Most against
  • Austria11
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • France
  • Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 8Against 11Abstain 0Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 17Against 3Abstain 0Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 11Against 3Abstain 0Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 2Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 9Against 2Abstain 9Absent 1
Denmark15 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 1Absent 2
Estonia7 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
France81 MEPs
For 36Against 32Abstain 1Absent 12
Germany96 MEPs
For 61Against 14Abstain 7Absent 14
Greece21 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 0Absent 13
Hungary21 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 1Absent 20
Ireland14 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 1Absent 2
Italy76 MEPs
For 46Against 7Abstain 0Absent 23
Latvia9 MEPs
For 7Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 10Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 18Against 6Abstain 1Absent 6
Poland53 MEPs
For 37Against 7Abstain 0Absent 9
Portugal21 MEPs
For 16Against 2Abstain 1Absent 2
Romania33 MEPs
For 20Against 1Abstain 0Absent 12
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 9Against 1Abstain 4Absent 1
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 44Against 4Abstain 0Absent 12
Sweden21 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 3Absent 4

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share