EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2025-11-26

Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons

Defence & Security66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "weapons"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Defence & Security
Vote ID 181956Source: official EP roll-call records
58
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Procedural or paragraph vote
  • High-interest topic: Defence
  • Some political group division
  • Significant national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+15 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+3 / 25
Close vote+3 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+15 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons”. S&D, ECR, Greens-EFA and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE, Renew, Left and NI voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (269 for, 337 against, 55 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.

Result analysis

For
269
Against
337
Abstain
55
Margin of victory
68 votes
Turnout (cast)
661
Absent
58
Participation rate
91.9%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 1Against 173Abstain 1Absent 10
S&D135 MEPs
For 110Against 2Abstain 13Absent 10
PfE84 MEPs
For 9Against 37Abstain 34Absent 4
ECR82 MEPs
For 63Against 10Abstain 1Absent 8
Renew78 MEPs
For 9Against 59Abstain 1Absent 9
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 51Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
The Left45 MEPs
For 7Against 30Abstain 0Absent 8
NI29 MEPs
For 2Against 24Abstain 0Absent 3
ESN27 MEPs
For 17Against 2Abstain 3Absent 5

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Italy43
  • Netherlands20
  • Sweden13
  • Finland8
  • Denmark7
Most against
  • France54
  • Germany50
  • Poland32
  • Spain25
  • Romania15
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Croatia
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • Germany
  • Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 7Against 13Abstain 0Absent 0
Belgium22 MEPs
For 10Against 11Abstain 0Absent 1
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 5Against 10Abstain 0Absent 2
Croatia12 MEPs
For 6Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 2Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 5Against 6Abstain 10Absent 0
Denmark15 MEPs
For 7Against 6Abstain 1Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 1Against 4Abstain 2Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 8Against 5Abstain 0Absent 2
France81 MEPs
For 18Against 54Abstain 0Absent 9
Germany96 MEPs
For 39Against 50Abstain 2Absent 5
Greece21 MEPs
For 7Against 11Abstain 1Absent 2
Hungary21 MEPs
For 3Against 5Abstain 10Absent 3
Ireland14 MEPs
For 4Against 7Abstain 1Absent 2
Italy76 MEPs
For 43Against 19Abstain 6Absent 8
Latvia9 MEPs
For 4Against 3Abstain 2Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 5Against 5Abstain 0Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 2Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 1Against 2Abstain 2Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 20Against 7Abstain 0Absent 4
Poland53 MEPs
For 15Against 32Abstain 1Absent 5
Portugal21 MEPs
For 7Against 9Abstain 2Absent 3
Romania33 MEPs
For 8Against 15Abstain 9Absent 1
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 3Against 9Abstain 0Absent 3
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 2Against 7Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain60 MEPs
For 24Against 25Abstain 6Absent 5
Sweden21 MEPs
For 13Against 8Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share