Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons
Defence & Security66%★
- title/description contains "weapons"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Defence
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons”. S&D, ECR, Greens-EFA and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE, Renew, Left and NI voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (269 for, 337 against, 55 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Italy43
- Netherlands20
- Sweden13
- Finland8
- Denmark7
- France54
- Germany50
- Poland32
- Spain25
- Romania15
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…