← Votes·2025-11-26

Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material

Defence & Security66%★

Confidence: 66%

Assigned by: rule-based classifier

Evidence:

title/description contains "weapons"

Reviewed: no

Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1

View all votes on Defence & Security →

Vote ID 182010Source: official EP roll-call records

Official roll-call results (EP minutes) ↗

/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

✓High-interest topic: Defence
✓Strong political group division
✓Significant national delegation divergence
✓High participation
✓Many MEPs voted against their group

Show full breakdown

Topic importance+15 / 15

Turnout+5 / 5

Vote type+0 / 25

Close vote+0 / 15

Legislative+0 / 15

Rebel votes+10 / 10

Group division+12 / 15

Country division+12 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material”. ECR, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (155 for, 413 against, 80 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For

155

Against

413

Abstain

Margin of victory

258 votes

Turnout (cast)

648

Absent

Participation rate

90.1%

✓This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs

For 1Against 168Abstain 3Absent 13

S&D135 MEPs

For 3Against 110Abstain 0Absent 22

PfE84 MEPs

For 14Against 1Abstain 65Absent 4

ECR82 MEPs

For 53Against 18Abstain 4Absent 7

Renew78 MEPs

For 0Against 71Abstain 0Absent 7

Greens/EFA53 MEPs

For 13Against 38Abstain 0Absent 2

The Left45 MEPs

For 36Against 0Abstain 0Absent 9

NI29 MEPs

For 21Against 5Abstain 1Absent 2

ESN27 MEPs

For 14Against 2Abstain 6Absent 5

Country angle

Most in favour

Greece9
Cyprus3

Most against

Germany70
Poland43
Spain39
Italy32
Romania23

Divided delegations

Czech Republic
France
Greece
Italy
Latvia
Slovakia
Sweden

Full breakdown by all countries

Austria20 MEPs

For 6Against 14Abstain 0Absent 0

Belgium22 MEPs

For 4Against 11Abstain 5Absent 2

Bulgaria17 MEPs

For 4Against 10Abstain 0Absent 3

Croatia12 MEPs

For 2Against 9Abstain 0Absent 1

Cyprus6 MEPs

For 3Against 1Abstain 2Absent 0

Czech Republic21 MEPs

For 5Against 5Abstain 11Absent 0

Denmark15 MEPs

For 2Against 11Abstain 1Absent 1

Estonia7 MEPs

For 0Against 6Abstain 1Absent 0

Finland15 MEPs

For 4Against 9Abstain 0Absent 2

France81 MEPs

For 16Against 17Abstain 29Absent 19

Germany96 MEPs

For 19Against 70Abstain 2Absent 5

Greece21 MEPs

For 9Against 9Abstain 1Absent 2

Hungary21 MEPs

For 1Against 7Abstain 10Absent 3

Ireland14 MEPs

For 3Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1

Italy76 MEPs

For 29Against 32Abstain 6Absent 9

Latvia9 MEPs

For 4Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0

Lithuania11 MEPs

For 1Against 9Abstain 0Absent 1

Luxembourg6 MEPs

For 1Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0

Malta6 MEPs

For 0Against 5Abstain 0Absent 1

Netherlands31 MEPs

For 7Against 20Abstain 0Absent 4

Poland53 MEPs

For 5Against 43Abstain 1Absent 4

Portugal21 MEPs

For 0Against 15Abstain 2Absent 4

Romania33 MEPs

For 8Against 23Abstain 1Absent 1

Slovakia15 MEPs

For 5Against 6Abstain 2Absent 2

Slovenia9 MEPs

For 0Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0

Spain60 MEPs

For 9Against 39Abstain 6Absent 6

Sweden21 MEPs

For 8Against 13Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…