← Votes·2025-11-26

Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material

Defence & Security66%★

Confidence: 66%

Assigned by: rule-based classifier

Evidence:

title/description contains "weapons"

Reviewed: no

Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1

View all votes on Defence & Security →

Vote ID 182013Source: official EP roll-call records

Official roll-call results (EP minutes) ↗

/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

✓High-interest topic: Defence
✓Some political group division
✓Some national delegation divergence
✓High participation
✓Many MEPs voted against their group

Show full breakdown

Topic importance+15 / 15

Turnout+5 / 5

Vote type+0 / 25

Close vote+0 / 15

Legislative+0 / 15

Rebel votes+10 / 10

Group division+10 / 15

Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material”. PfE, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, Greens-EFA and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (133 for, 492 against, 22 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For

133

Against

492

Abstain

Margin of victory

359 votes

Turnout (cast)

647

Absent

Participation rate

90.0%

✓This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs

For 8Against 166Abstain 0Absent 11

S&D135 MEPs

For 8Against 104Abstain 0Absent 23

PfE84 MEPs

For 44Against 22Abstain 13Absent 5

ECR82 MEPs

For 5Against 65Abstain 3Absent 9

Renew78 MEPs

For 0Against 71Abstain 0Absent 7

Greens/EFA53 MEPs

For 12Against 38Abstain 0Absent 3

The Left45 MEPs

For 37Against 0Abstain 1Absent 7

NI29 MEPs

For 16Against 7Abstain 4Absent 2

ESN27 MEPs

For 2Against 19Abstain 1Absent 5

Country angle

Most in favour

France44
Greece13
Czech Republic11
Slovakia6
Cyprus4

Most against

Germany82
Italy56
Poland46
Spain44
Romania30

Divided delegations

Belgium
Czech Republic
Malta
Slovakia

Full breakdown by all countries

Austria20 MEPs

For 0Against 14Abstain 6Absent 0

Belgium22 MEPs

For 7Against 13Abstain 0Absent 2

Bulgaria17 MEPs

For 1Against 14Abstain 0Absent 2

Croatia12 MEPs

For 1Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0

Cyprus6 MEPs

For 4Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0

Czech Republic21 MEPs

For 11Against 9Abstain 1Absent 0

Denmark15 MEPs

For 2Against 12Abstain 0Absent 1

Estonia7 MEPs

For 0Against 7Abstain 0Absent 0

Finland15 MEPs

For 3Against 10Abstain 0Absent 2

France81 MEPs

For 44Against 17Abstain 1Absent 19

Germany96 MEPs

For 10Against 82Abstain 0Absent 4

Greece21 MEPs

For 13Against 3Abstain 3Absent 2

Hungary21 MEPs

For 3Against 15Abstain 0Absent 3

Ireland14 MEPs

For 3Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1

Italy76 MEPs

For 10Against 56Abstain 0Absent 10

Latvia9 MEPs

For 0Against 8Abstain 0Absent 1

Lithuania11 MEPs

For 0Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1

Luxembourg6 MEPs

For 0Against 5Abstain 1Absent 0

Malta6 MEPs

For 3Against 2Abstain 0Absent 1

Netherlands31 MEPs

For 0Against 26Abstain 0Absent 5

Poland53 MEPs

For 1Against 46Abstain 0Absent 6

Portugal21 MEPs

For 1Against 15Abstain 2Absent 3

Romania33 MEPs

For 1Against 30Abstain 1Absent 1

Slovakia15 MEPs

For 6Against 6Abstain 1Absent 2

Slovenia9 MEPs

For 0Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0

Spain60 MEPs

For 4Against 44Abstain 6Absent 6

Sweden21 MEPs

For 5Against 16Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…