Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material
Defence & Security66%★
- title/description contains "weapons"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Defence
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material”. PfE, Left, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (170 for, 399 against, 71 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France40
- Austria11
- Czech Republic11
- Slovakia6
- Malta3
- Germany64
- Spain43
- Poland42
- Italy30
- Romania24
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Greece
- Malta
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…