EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2025-11-26

Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material

Defence & Security66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "weapons"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Defence & Security
Vote ID 182039Source: official EP roll-call records
47
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • High-interest topic: Defence
  • Strong political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+15 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+12 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material”. Left, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly against. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (94 for, 477 against, 80 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
94
Against
477
Abstain
80
Margin of victory
383 votes
Turnout (cast)
651
Absent
68
Participation rate
90.5%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 2Against 172Abstain 0Absent 11
S&D135 MEPs
For 6Against 108Abstain 0Absent 21
PfE84 MEPs
For 0Against 12Abstain 68Absent 4
ECR82 MEPs
For 10Against 62Abstain 4Absent 6
Renew78 MEPs
For 0Against 70Abstain 0Absent 8
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 10Against 40Abstain 1Absent 2
The Left45 MEPs
For 37Against 0Abstain 0Absent 8
NI29 MEPs
For 14Against 10Abstain 3Absent 2
ESN27 MEPs
For 15Against 3Abstain 3Absent 6

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Malta3
Most against
  • Germany70
  • Italy52
  • Spain47
  • Poland45
  • Romania29
Divided delegations
  • Cyprus
  • France
  • Greece
  • Malta
  • Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 0Against 12Abstain 6Absent 2
Belgium22 MEPs
For 4Against 13Abstain 3Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 3Against 11Abstain 0Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 0Against 12Abstain 0Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 2Against 3Abstain 1Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 3Against 8Abstain 10Absent 0
Denmark15 MEPs
For 2Against 11Abstain 1Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 0Against 7Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 4Against 9Abstain 0Absent 2
France81 MEPs
For 16Against 17Abstain 29Absent 19
Germany96 MEPs
For 21Against 70Abstain 0Absent 5
Greece21 MEPs
For 6Against 11Abstain 2Absent 2
Hungary21 MEPs
For 0Against 17Abstain 1Absent 3
Ireland14 MEPs
For 3Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0
Italy76 MEPs
For 10Against 52Abstain 7Absent 7
Latvia9 MEPs
For 0Against 8Abstain 1Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 1Against 9Abstain 0Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 1Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 3Against 2Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 0Against 21Abstain 6Absent 4
Poland53 MEPs
For 0Against 45Abstain 4Absent 4
Portugal21 MEPs
For 0Against 15Abstain 2Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 2Against 29Abstain 1Absent 1
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 3Against 10Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 0Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain60 MEPs
For 2Against 47Abstain 6Absent 5
Sweden21 MEPs
For 8Against 13Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share