EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2025-11-26

Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material

Defence & Security66%
Confidence: 66%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "weapons"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Defence & Security
Vote ID 182041Source: official EP roll-call records
45
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • High-interest topic: Defence
  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+15 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material”. PfE, ECR, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (182 for, 436 against, 31 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
182
Against
436
Abstain
31
Margin of victory
254 votes
Turnout (cast)
649
Absent
70
Participation rate
90.3%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 2Against 173Abstain 0Absent 10
S&D135 MEPs
For 4Against 109Abstain 1Absent 21
PfE84 MEPs
For 67Against 11Abstain 1Absent 5
ECR82 MEPs
For 34Against 18Abstain 22Absent 8
Renew78 MEPs
For 2Against 68Abstain 0Absent 8
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 9Against 40Abstain 1Absent 3
The Left45 MEPs
For 38Against 0Abstain 0Absent 7
NI29 MEPs
For 21Against 2Abstain 3Absent 3
ESN27 MEPs
For 4Against 15Abstain 3Absent 5

Country angle

Most in favour
  • France45
  • Czech Republic13
  • Greece10
  • Slovakia7
  • Cyprus3
Most against
  • Germany78
  • Spain43
  • Poland41
  • Italy29
  • Romania24
Divided delegations
  • Belgium
  • Cyprus
  • Finland
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Latvia
  • Slovakia
  • Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 6Against 14Abstain 0Absent 0
Belgium22 MEPs
For 9Against 11Abstain 0Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 1Against 13Abstain 0Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 2Against 10Abstain 0Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 3Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 13Against 6Abstain 1Absent 1
Denmark15 MEPs
For 3Against 11Abstain 0Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 0Against 7Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 5Against 8Abstain 0Absent 2
France81 MEPs
For 45Against 16Abstain 1Absent 19
Germany96 MEPs
For 13Against 78Abstain 1Absent 4
Greece21 MEPs
For 10Against 9Abstain 0Absent 2
Hungary21 MEPs
For 0Against 18Abstain 0Absent 3
Ireland14 MEPs
For 3Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0
Italy76 MEPs
For 16Against 29Abstain 23Absent 8
Latvia9 MEPs
For 4Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 0Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 1Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1
Malta6 MEPs
For 1Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 7Against 20Abstain 0Absent 4
Poland53 MEPs
For 4Against 41Abstain 3Absent 5
Portugal21 MEPs
For 3Against 15Abstain 0Absent 3
Romania33 MEPs
For 6Against 24Abstain 1Absent 2
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 7Against 6Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 0Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain60 MEPs
For 10Against 43Abstain 1Absent 6
Sweden21 MEPs
For 10Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share