Political situation in Myanmar including the humanitarian crisis of the Rohingya
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "myanmar"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Political situation in Myanmar including the humanitarian crisis of the Rohingya”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly against. NI mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (263 for, 291 against, 26 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.
Result analysis
Close vote analysis
The margin was 28 votes. 139 MEPs did not vote.
Groups whose absences exceeded the margin
- EPPhad 39 absent MEPs (margin was 28)
- S&Dhad 32 absent MEPs (margin was 28)
Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.
By political group
Country angle
- Germany37
- Spain23
- Netherlands14
- Sweden12
- Belgium10
- Poland42
- France40
- Italy28
- Romania17
- Czech Republic9
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Estonia
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…