Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "sudan"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan”. EPP, PfE, ECR, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (323 for, 249 against, 14 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland44
- France39
- Germany37
- Italy29
- Spain24
- Netherlands15
- Belgium12
- Sweden10
- Austria9
- Denmark9
- Austria
- Croatia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- France
- Germany
- Italy
- Latvia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…