Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "sudan"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan”. S&D, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE, ECR, Renew and NI voted mostly against. ESN mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (206 for, 353 against, 30 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany37
- Sweden10
- Ireland7
- Croatia5
- Finland5
- France46
- Poland44
- Italy30
- Spain26
- Romania21
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Denmark
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…