Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "sudan"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan”. EPP, S&D, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while PfE, ECR, Renew, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (316 for, 260 against, 14 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany55
- Italy36
- Spain35
- Romania16
- Netherlands15
- France48
- Poland24
- Czech Republic14
- Hungary13
- Bulgaria10
- Austria
- Belgium
- Cyprus
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…