Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "sudan"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP and PfE voted mostly against. ECR and NI mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (293 for, 197 against, 94 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany46
- Italy28
- Spain22
- Netherlands15
- Romania13
- France36
- Poland23
- Portugal8
- Slovenia5
- Greece3
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Latvia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…