Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "tunisia"
Rule of Law65%
- title/description contains "rule of law"
Human Rights64%
- title/description contains "human rights"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani”. EPP, PfE, ECR, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (246 for, 317 against, 31 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland41
- France40
- Italy27
- Czech Republic15
- Romania15
- Germany58
- Spain40
- Netherlands15
- Portugal14
- Belgium13
- Austria
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- France
- Italy
- Netherlands
- Romania
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…