Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "tunisia"
Rule of Law65%
- title/description contains "rule of law"
Human Rights64%
- title/description contains "human rights"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while PfE and ESN voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (464 for, 58 against, 75 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany68
- Poland44
- Spain44
- France38
- Italy29
None.
- France
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…