Amending the Directive on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes ***II
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Amending the Directive on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes ***II”. PfE and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (122 for, 470 against, 69 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Czech Republic10
- Hungary9
- Germany65
- Spain46
- France42
- Italy42
- Poland28
- Czech Republic
- France
- Hungary
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…