Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)”. PfE, ECR, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (130 for, 316 against, 3 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Czech Republic10
- Hungary5
- Slovakia5
- Germany47
- Spain39
- France35
- Italy28
- Poland21
- France
- Hungary
- Poland
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…