Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group (preventing sexual harassment)
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group (preventing sexual harassment)”. EPP, S&D, PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly in favour, while Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. NI mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (323 for, 112 against, 12 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France43
- Spain41
- Germany35
- Poland34
- Italy32
- Denmark6
- Luxembourg2
- Belgium
- Germany
- Lithuania
- Netherlands
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…