Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept ***I
Institutional Affairs61%★
- title/description contains "interinstitutional"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept ***I”. EPP, ECR, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (384 for, 237 against, 31 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany53
- Poland45
- Italy41
- France40
- Spain28
- Portugal15
- Belgium8
- Ireland8
- Finland6
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…