← Votes·2025-12-18

Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania

Vote ID 182919Source: official EP roll-call records

Official roll-call results (EP minutes) ↗

/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

✓Some political group division
✓Some national delegation divergence
✓High participation
✓Many MEPs voted against their group

Show full breakdown

Topic importance+0 / 15

Turnout+4 / 5

Vote type+0 / 25

Close vote+0 / 15

Legislative+0 / 15

Rebel votes+7 / 10

Group division+10 / 15

Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania”. EPP, S&D, ECR, PfE, Renew and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while Left, ESN and NI voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (472 for, 61 against, 24 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For

472

Against

Abstain

Margin of victory

411 votes

Turnout (cast)

557

Absent

162

Participation rate

77.5%

✓This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs

For 144Against 1Abstain 0Absent 40

S&D135 MEPs

For 97Against 0Abstain 0Absent 38

ECR82 MEPs

For 67Against 0Abstain 2Absent 13

PfE84 MEPs

For 52Against 0Abstain 12Absent 20

Renew78 MEPs

For 58Against 0Abstain 1Absent 19

Greens/EFA53 MEPs

For 42Against 0Abstain 0Absent 11

The Left45 MEPs

For 4Against 30Abstain 1Absent 10

ESN27 MEPs

For 3Against 17Abstain 3Absent 4

NI29 MEPs

For 4Against 13Abstain 5Absent 7

Country angle

Most in favour

Germany58
France56
Italy49
Spain43
Poland41

Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries

Austria20 MEPs

For 11Against 1Abstain 6Absent 2

Belgium22 MEPs

For 12Against 2Abstain 3Absent 5

Bulgaria17 MEPs

For 11Against 1Abstain 0Absent 5

Croatia12 MEPs

For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Cyprus6 MEPs

For 3Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2

Czech Republic21 MEPs

For 18Against 1Abstain 1Absent 1

Denmark15 MEPs

For 12Against 0Abstain 1Absent 2

Estonia7 MEPs

For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Finland15 MEPs

For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5

France81 MEPs

For 56Against 7Abstain 0Absent 18

Germany96 MEPs

For 58Against 26Abstain 0Absent 12

Greece21 MEPs

For 2Against 1Abstain 3Absent 15

Hungary21 MEPs

For 2Against 1Abstain 0Absent 18

Ireland14 MEPs

For 6Against 3Abstain 1Absent 4

Italy76 MEPs

For 49Against 9Abstain 0Absent 18

Latvia9 MEPs

For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Lithuania11 MEPs

For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Luxembourg6 MEPs

For 5Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0

Malta6 MEPs

For 2Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4

Netherlands31 MEPs

For 26Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5

Poland53 MEPs

For 41Against 0Abstain 5Absent 7

Portugal21 MEPs

For 17Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4

Romania33 MEPs

For 17Against 0Abstain 0Absent 16

Slovakia15 MEPs

For 7Against 3Abstain 3Absent 2

Slovenia9 MEPs

For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Spain60 MEPs

For 43Against 4Abstain 0Absent 13

Sweden21 MEPs

For 18Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…