Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)
Trade65%★
- title/description contains "trade agreement"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)”. PfE, ECR, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (225 for, 402 against, 13 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France43
- Poland43
- Hungary18
- Romania14
- Slovakia9
- Germany69
- Italy55
- Spain43
- Netherlands21
- Sweden18
- Austria
- Bulgaria
- Cyprus
- Ireland
- Romania
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…