Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness
Budget66%★
- title/description contains "budget"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Resolution / budget vote
- ✓Budget-related
- ✓High-interest topic: Budget
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness”. EPP, PfE, ECR, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (364 for, 258 against, 5 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany48
- Poland42
- France40
- Italy35
- Spain33
- Netherlands17
- Portugal11
- Belgium9
- Denmark9
- Finland9
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Estonia
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…